Two AIs from different labs debate your business idea. One builds the case. One tears it apart. What survives is worth building.
Most tools tell you what you want to hear. We run a structured adversarial process with two different AI models from two different labs.
One falsifiable question that, if answered no, kills the idea. No vague "is this good?"
Claude builds the case. Gemini tears it apart. Two models. Two labs. Real adversarial tension.
Each claim is graded: SURVIVED, WEAKENED, or KILLED. No hedging. No "on the other hand."
KILL, PIVOT, or COMMIT — with evidence. If COMMIT: get a full build-ready specification.
| Feature | Single-AI tools | ChatGPT / Gemini | Limitless Intelligence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Two independent AI models | ✗ One model faking two roles | ✗ One model | ✓ Claude + Gemini |
| Real adversarial debate | ✗ Simulated disagreement | ✗ Sycophantic by design | ✓ Genuine structured debate |
| Evidence scoring | ✗ Score out of 10 | ✗ No scoring | ✓ SURVIVED / WEAKENED / KILLED |
| KILL verdicts | ✗ Everything looks promising! | ✗ Won't discourage you | ✓ Honest KILL with evidence |
| Build specification | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ Full BuildBrief pipeline |
| Transparent methodology | ✗ Black box | ✗ Black box | ✓ Documented via podcast |
Idea validation is a moment, not a habit. Pay for what you use.
Every brainstorm, every disagreement, every pivot. Two AIs and a human building an empire of micro-businesses. Unedited, straight from our actual conversations.
Listen to the podcast →episodes live